Take Responsibility For Being Understood In 3 Simple Steps

​We all have our own sense of what normal is

Problems arise with communication when people expect everyone around them to see the world as they see it. In other words, they expect what’s normal for them to be normal for everyone else.

Many of my clients are sharp, fast thinkers. And they often get frustrated over breakdowns in communication at work, especially when other people “don’t instantly get” what they are saying and doing.

When you assume everyone sees and understands the world the way you do, you can fall into the Tunnel Vision Trap: You expect everyone to think and communicate the way you do.

The hard truth is, that’s never going to happen.

We are all unique; and the way each of us process the world around us is unique, too.
Communication is a two-way street, and the goal is mutual understanding.

If you get trapped in the limiting mindset of “They just don’t get it,” then you will never find common ground.

That’s like putting yourself on a pedestal and trying to communicate while you look down at everyone else. Connection and understanding can never happen from that space.
What would happen if you flipped the situation around and tried seeing it from the other person’s point of view?

Can you open your mind to the reality that there are times when the other side feels just as frustrated as you do?
If you find yourself at a communication impasse:

  • First, accept that we are all imperfect and unique. We all see the world through our own lenses.
  • Then look at the situation and try to find equal footing. Ask yourself: “Where do your experiences or understanding overlap?”
  • Finally, step back and ask yourself, “Am I presenting this information in a way that is clear and easy to understand?”

Remember each of us all have the responsibility to communicate so that the other side understands.


Are you taking full responsibility in how you are communicating? Or do you expect everyone else to just “get it?

– Nozomi Morgan


Facing The Giant


Once upon a time, in a land far away, there lived a very bright and trustworthy young woman. Having learned all she could in her own village, she set out to explore the neighboring lands. After a time, she came upon a great city surrounded by a huge castle wall. “Surely I can learn something new from the people here,” she thought to herself. But after entering the city, she found its people too frightened and depressed to share any wisdom. “Why is everyone here so sad?” she asked.

One trembling citizen answered, “Today is the day the giant comes.”

“Giant?” she scoffed in disbelief. “There’s no such thing as giants!”

“Oh, but there is,” came a response. “He stands over 10 feet tall! So tall, he can’t rightly be called a man at all.”

Skeptical, but intrigued, the young woman pleaded, “Tell me more of this giant.”

So the frightened citizen nervously explained to her, “Every year, on the same day, and at the same hour, he comes down from the mountain where he lives. He stands at the edge of the clearing and yells, ‘Send out your bravest man for me to fight, or I will knock down these walls and kill everyone inside!’ Each year, one poor valiant soul steps out to face the giant, and there he stands, mesmerized by the giant’s enormity and the impossible task ahead. And every year, the giant slays the poor warrior where he stands before he even has a chance to draw his sword. The warrior doesn’t even move. It’s as if he is hypnotized.”

Eyes wide with fascination, the woman begs, “Can I see this giant?”

“The only way to see the giant,” the citizen explained, “is to face him in battle.”

Still in disbelief but eager to learn, the woman responded, “Then that is what I will do! I will face your giant today.”

Shortly thereafter, at the appointed hour, the giant’s distant but powerful voice was heard over the castle walls, “Send out your bravest man for me to fight, or I will knock down these walls and kill everyone inside!” Unshaken, the young woman stepped out through the castle gate to face her opponent.

She looked out across the clearing to the edge of the forest at the foothills of the mountain. Sure enough, there stood an enormous giant! For a moment, she just stood and stared at him from a distance. There was a gentle rise in the ground separating the two, so she could only see him from the waist up. It was difficult to tell exactly how big he was, but he was clearly taller than any man she had ever seen or heard of. She was struck with the same awe and terror all of her predecessors surely felt at that moment. The giant was real. And facing him today, she would surely die. She considered running back inside the castle walls. But she had given her word to the good people inside to face their giant. So with all the bravery she could muster, she began to walk tentatively toward the giant. And the giant began to walk toward her.

After a few paces up the gentle incline, she gained full line of sight to the giant, and could see his whole form. With this better angle, she could tell he was not nearly the 10 feet in height she first believed, perhaps only 7 feet tall. He was still massive, but at least now in human proportions. She was still no match for him, but at least she would meet her defeat at the hands of something recognizable.

With that element of the unknown removed, she was able to walk at a normal pace. And after a few more steps, the giant appeared to be smaller still. Was this some strange optical illusion? The giant appeared to be not much bigger than she was now. She might actually have a fighting chance! With this new hope, her pace quickened. And with every step, she could tell it was no illusion. The giant was actually shrinking before her very eyes, and the faster she ran, the faster the giant shrank.

Her terror had turned to hope, and now that hope had turned to confidence. Certain of her victory, she was now in an all-out sprint toward the giant. As she reached the middle of the clearing she stopped and stood toe to toe with the giant, who was now only 12 inches tall and still shrinking quickly. She reached down and picked him up in the palm of her hand. She only had time to ask him one question before he shrank down to the size of a grain of sand and blew away in the next gust of wind.

“Who are you?” she asked earnestly.

The giant responded in a tiny and dwindling voice, “I am known by many names. To the Chinese, I am kŏngjù. To the Greeks, I am phobos. But to your people, brave one, I am known simply as. . . fear.”

She had come to this village to learn something. And indeed she had. If you face your fears and confront them with confidence, they will shrink before your very eyes.

Whether facing a giant in battle or simply using the company’s new accounts receivable system, the fear of failure can be debilitating. It can paralyze us and prevent us from even trying. But once you start making honest strides on the task, the size of the challenge begins to shrink. Once we’ve made progress, no matter how little, we earn some small amount of confidence, and the remaining work is diminished. It becomes less daunting with each step.

Preseverence: A Pringles Story

​I am submitting this post today with a deep belief in the message of this story. Every segment of ours that you see today and are proud of with super duper market shares were down in ashes at one time and we were almost written off by everyone. However with the belief in our hardwork and ability to persist in the face of defeat ,we changed the game and became consitent winners overtime. 

Giving up is a choice, it is a decision you make. Know that when you make a choice of Not giving up, sucess will only be a feet away.

Perseverance in the face of defeat is a required character trait in sports and politics. You have to lose a few games and races on the road to the Super Bowl or to Washington. But is persistence useful in business? Or does success in business only come by backing winners only as long as they’re winners? Consider the story of Pringles snack chips.

Procter & Gamble first test marketed Pringles in September 1968 in Evansville, Indiana, and began shipping it to grocery stores across the United States in 1971. It was an instant success. By 1975, it had become a household name, had a 15 percent market share, and more than 10 million cases a year were being sold.
A year later, however, sales dropped 20 percent—enough to send any brand manager into panic mode. The following year, sales dropped another 10 percent. That’s probably when speculation began that the brand would be put up for sale. P&G wasn’t used to such steep sales declines. Certainly not two years in a row.
Another year went by, and another 10 percent of sales vanished. Can you imagine how hard it must have been to recruit employees to accept an assignment on Pringles with sales plummeting and rumors of a sale looming? By 1979, the brand was in free fall. Sales dropped over 30 percent, and were now down to 4 million cases a year—a 60 percent decline in four years! That’s when a line was drawn in the sand. P&G executives declared they would either fix the brand, or sell it, in five years.
Over the next 18 months, management put several major changes in place. It commissioned new research to develop a ground-up understanding of the consumer. Product improvements gave Pringles a better taste and more variety. New advertising touted the unique benefits of the saddle-shaped chips. A price reduction made Pringles more competitive with traditional potato chips. And a major cost savings project helped the brand afford the price reductions and product improvements.
Sales continued to decline, but at a much slower rate. In 1980, sales were down about half a million cases, to 3.4 million. And in 1981, they bottomed out at 3 million. The next year, sales started to grow—slowly at first, and then faster. By 1984, Pringles sales were 5 million cases. In 1986, it was up to 7 million. By 1989, sales were back to their 1975 peak of 10 million cases. And by the end of the 1990s, sales of Pringles were over 50 million cases.

The Lesson
In December of 1984, just after the turnaround started, the head of P&G Sales, Mike Milligan, gave a speech to a group of employees, shareholders, and members of the press. In it, he shared five key lessons the company learned from the experience. In hindsight, the first three shouldn’t be too surprising: 
(1) know what your consumer wants, (2) develop a product and marketing messages to meet those expectations, and (3) organize a strong team to deliver results.

The fourth lesson was a little more interesting: Set realistic goals. Notice they adopted a five-year plan, not a one-year plan. They realized the magnitude of the changes they needed to make were too ambitious to accomplish in a matter of months. Despite that, they succeeded two years ahead of schedule.
The final lesson Mike explained, however, is the most telling of all, and the key point I want to make. He summarized it in two simple words: “Don’t stop.” Don’t give up too soon. Imagine how easy it would have been for management to give up on the Pringles brand. And how many times had they probably considered it in the late 1970s?
Instead, they persevered. They pushed on through six years of nerve-wracking sales declines and fixed the business.

As a result of that perseverance, Pringles became a star in the P&G stable of iconic brands, and was eventually sold to Kellogg in 2012 for $2.7 Billion.



Thomas Edison summarized the wisdom of perseverance in a single sentence when he observed, “Many of life’s failures are people who didn’t realize how close they were to success when they gave up.” Don’t be one of them.
Don’t be one of them.

Adapted from Paul Smith 

STOP PLANNING AND START ACTING

I saw a facebook post about Nokia yesterday and it urged me to write this post, it also reminded me that about a year and a half back, I told you that they were the inventors of touch screen technology but they never introduced it in the market(Fear of Change)
, up until Apple and others brought it in. It also made them exit from the game they once ruled. Apart from them there was a similar giant who got ducked up in its own game. Read it on, though we are not in the same industry, this is absolutely relevant to us. It is not only a bitter reality check for us, but it also helps us draw conclusions and learnings from the mistakes of these giants.

image

Many of us get stuck between wanting to Act and Taking Action.The uncertainity of the uncharted path can be daunting. Sometimes it feels as if circumstances are conspiring against us, and we find ourselves Riveted in place.

In corporate cultures that hesitation can translate into what is called as “knowing-doing gap” the space between what we know we should do and what we actually do. It can lead to our paralysis when Talk becomes substitute for action

This knowing-doing gap, is seen almost everywhere . For example it was witnessed first hand at the Eastman  Kodak company. On a cold Spring Day in the mid 1990s, an IDEO team of researchers traveled to Rochester, New York ,for an audience with the Kodak executive team. They found a large group of leaders with deep expertise who at least intellectually understood that the future of photography was digital.

Looking back,business historians may be tempted to suggest that Kodak’s leadership was naive. But that was not the case in fact they had to race to keep up with CEO George Fisher’s Agile mind. And no one could say Kodak lacked knowledge of Digital Photography. They had actually invented the digital camera in 1975 and later pioneered the world’s first mega pixel sensor. Kodak had a head start that should have yielded lasting advantage. So why you didn’t all the knowledge and the first mover advantage turning to the decisive action.

image

For starters tradition caught in the way of innovation Kodaks glorious past was just too alluring. Kodak had essentially owned consumer photography for hundred years, with market share in some segments as high as 90%. By contrast, digital ventures all seemed so risky, and Kodak wasn’t providing enough “soft landings” for managers willing to take career risks in those new areas. Facing strong Global competitors in the digital market, Kodak knew that it would struggle and fear of failure transfixed the management team

image

Caught in the knowing doing gap, Kodak clung too closely to the chemistry based business that has been so successful for them in the 20th century, under investing in the digital world of 21st. What they saw at Kodak was not a lack of information but the failure to turn insight into effective action. As a result one of the most powerful brands in America lost its way.
                                 
Similarly,

Nokia CEO ended his speech saying this “we didn’t do anything wrong, but somehow, we lost”.

image

During the press conference to koo announce NOKIA being acquired by Microsoft, Nokia CEO ended his speech saying this “we didn’t do anything wrong, but somehow, we lost”. Upon saying that, all his management team, himself included, teared sadly.

Nokia has been a respectable company. They didn’t do anything wrong in their business, however, the world changed too fast. Their opponents were too powerful.

They missed out on learning, they missed out on changing, and thus they lost the opportunity at hand to make it big. Not only did they miss the opportunity to earn big money, they lost their chance of survival.

The message of this story is, if you don’t change, you shall be removed from the competition.

It’s not wrong if you don’t want to learn new things. However, if your thoughts and mindset cannot catch up with time, you will be eliminated.

Conclusion:

1. The advantage you have yesterday, will be replaced by the trends of tomorrow. You don’t have to do anything wrong, as long as your competitors catch the wave and do it RIGHT, you can lose out and fail.

2. To change and improve yourself is giving yourself a second chance. To be forced by others to change, is like being discarded.

3. Those who refuse to learn & improve, will definitely one day become redundant & not relevant to the industry. They will learn the lesson in a hard & expensive way.

Sometimes our efforts fail because of the level of commitment to change.”I’ll try” can become a half hearted promise of follow-through rather than decisive action. It’s as if today is for attempts, and the real action will happen at some future vague moment. To achieve your goal, to topple the barriers that stand in your way, you have to be focused on getting it done now. Or as  Yoda, another wise and seasoned change master, puts it to Luke Sky Walker in Star Wars, “Do or do not. There is no try”

image

Illustrations and Credits
Creative Confidence – Tom & David Kelley

The Short run and the Long run

From Seth Godin’s blog (Life Lesson)

It’s about scale. Pick a long enough one (or a short enough one) and you can see the edges.

In the short run, there’s never enough time.

In the long run, constrained resources become available.

In the short run, you can fool anyone.

In the long run, trust wins.

In the short run, we’ve got a vacancy, hire the next person you find.

In the long run, we spend most of our time with the people we’ve chosen in the short run.

In the short run, decisions feel more urgent and less important at the same time.

In the long run, most decisions are obvious and easy to make.

In the short run, it’s better to panic and obsess on emergencies and urgencies.

In the long run, spending time with people you love, doing work that matters, is all that counts.

In the short run, trade it all for attention.

In the long run, it’s good to own it (the means of production, the copyrights, the process).

In the short run, burn it down, someone else will clean up the problem.

In the long run, the environment in which we live is what we need to live.

In the short run, better to cut class.

In the long run, education pays off.

In the short run, tearing people down is a great way to get ahead.

In the long run, building things of value makes sense.

Add up the short runs, though, and you’re left with the long run. It’s going to be the long run a lot longer than the short run will last.

Act accordingly.

Failing All The Way To Sucess

image

The last post tells you to treat every opportunity as your last and embed that in your attitude, dismiss the notion that there will be another chance to fight back.

This post is about the ultimate enemy of mankind- Failure, and how in the face of repeated failures one needs to learn from it and carve the way to Success. Everyone fails at one point or another and it is ok to be afraid of failures , anyone who says they are not afraid of being afraid or scared of failures…they are lying. Use that fear of failure positively and learn from it everytime so that you become insanely succesful- Sandy

Your attitude towards failure determines your altitude after failure.” – John C. Maxwell

When he was just seven-years-old his family was forced to move out of their home and off their farm. Like other boys, he was expected to work to help support the family. When he turned nine, his mother died.

At the age of 22, the company he worked for went bankrupt and he lost his job. At 23, he ran for state legislature against 12 other candidates. He came in eighth.

At 24, he borrowed money to start a business with a friend. By the end of that first year, the business failed and local authorities took his possessions in order to pay off his debt. His partner soon died, and he assumed his partner’s share of debt as well.

When he turned 25, he ran for state legislature again. This time he won.

At 26, he was engaged to be married, but his fiancée died before the wedding. The next year he plunged into a deep depression and suffered a nervous breakdown.

At 29, he sought out to become speaker of the state legislature. He was defeated.

When he turned 34, he campaigned for a U.S. congressional seat. And he lost. The next year he ran for Congress again and this time he won.

At the age of 39 when his term ended, he was out of a job as his party had a one-term-limit rule.

The next year he tried to get a job as commissioner of the General Land Office, but he was denied. At 45, he campaigned for the U.S. Senate and lost by six electoral votes.

When he turned 47, he was one of the contenders for the vice-presidential nomination at his party’s national convention. He lost. At 49, he ran again for the same U.S. Senate seat a second time. He lost again.

Two years later, at the age of 51, after a lifetime of failure, disappointment, and loss, Abraham Lincoln was elected the sixteenth president of the United States.
image

Given his leadership in presiding over and ending the Civil War, preserving the Union, ending slavery, and rededicating America to the ideals of equality, liberty, and democracy, you could argue he was the most successful US president.

The point of this and other stories where characters demonstrate unbelievable resilience and perseverance is that achieving success may very well require setbacks and failures. And it is often only through how we react to our failures that determine whether we can ultimately go on to be successful.

Without failing, you’re not living.
image

“I’ve missed more than 9000 shots in my career and I’ve lost almost 300 games,” said Michael Jordan, arguably the best basketball player of all time and someone who failed regularly. “Twenty-six times, I’ve been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.”

The great inventor Thomas Edison was reported to have performed some 9,000 experiments before coming up with a successful version of the light bulb.

And when things go wrong there is typically enormous opportunity for learning. There is the need to honestly appraise what happened, identify who was responsible, to own what was our own part, and then to find creative and sustainable solutions so that it doesn’t happen again. This is as true for individuals as it is for organizations.

It has often been said that if you’re not learning from your failures, you are very likely repeating them.

“The difference between average people and achieving people is their perception of and response to failure,” says John C. Maxwell, author of Failing Forward: Turning Mistakes into Stepping Stones for Success.

Clearly without the experience of failing, it is hard to know how to succeed. It’s as if that taste of disappointment enables us to persevere.

Lincoln’s persistence to succeed despite a lifetime of failure, disappointment and loss helped him reach the highest office in the land and a lasting legacy of one the greatest leaders of United States Of America.

Make it a habit to embrace your failures as learning opportunities that enable you to reach your successes.

There Isn’t Always A Next Time

image

Part of our job is keeping the team motivated and instilling a sense of urgency. Left to our own devices, it’s easy to become complacent and slow. Is there a story that can inspire our team to face each opportunity as if it were the last, and not accept failures as temporary inevitabilities? Fortunately, there is. In fact, I’m sure there are many. Here is my favorite.

The 2004 season was destined to be a rebuilding year for this small-town high school basketball program in Arkansas. Most of the boys on the starting lineup were juniors. In fact, the entire squad had only one returning senior. This wasn’t a team anyone expected great things from. And as anticipated, the first half of the season, they won some and lost some. But in the second half they won almost every game, earning a berth in the state playoffs. It was an exciting time for a bunch of kids who weren’t supposed to be there in the first place.

The state tournament

Winning in the first round made their presence feel justified instead of like a fluke. When they won their second and third games by double-digit margins, it became clear they really did have a legitimate shot at the state title. When they won the semifinal game and landed in the state finals, it was like a scene out of the movie Hoosiers. This team of young, unproven juniors would play the defending champions— a team full of college prospects. It was a real David versus Goliath matchup.

The game was tight, going into double overtime. With about 15 seconds left, the underdogs had the ball and called a time-out. The coach called the play. They inbounded the ball to their star player, the point guard who had played a great game and rarely made mistakes. His job was to let the clock run down a few seconds before starting the play to take the last shot. In the excitement, however, he made a mistake. He let his defender stay too close to him for more than 5 seconds without passing. Their opponents took possession with less than 10 seconds left. Its star player drove to the basket, was fouled, and sank two free throws to win the game.

The Aftermath

Having been so close to victory after such an improbable string of wins, it was a crushing defeat for the players and their supporters. One of those supporters was Jeff Strong. His daughter was a good friend of one of the players, so he followed every game with anticipation. Jeff asked the player, “So, what’d you think about the game?”

The young man’s response was surprisingly nonchalant.

No big deal. We’re all juniors. We’ll all be back next year and win it for sure.

It was exactly the kind of thing caring parents would say to console their child after a bitter loss. No doubt, every player on the team was repeating the same mantra within hours of the game. Jeff agreed with the boy and offered his own words of encouragement for next year. But inside, he couldn’t help but think that this team had been given a great gift. And perhaps, unfortunately, they had missed their opportunity. The chance to play for state championships, even for great teams, is a rare thing, indeed.

Next season

The next year, the whole starting lineup was back, this time as seniors. This year, they were the team to beat, the heavy favorite to win the state title. The season started just like everyone expected. They went undefeated the entire season and earned the number-one seed in the state championship. As is typical, the highest-seeded teams are paired with the lowest-seeded teams early in the bracket to give the best teams the best chance to win and ultimately reach the finals. Unfortunately, in the first round— against a team they were highly favored to beat— they lost. Those players never got that second chance in the state finals they’d hoped for.

The Lesson

Does this disappointing end suggest the well-meaning parental advice that consoled the boys a year earlier was in poor judgment? Of course not. Nothing would be gained by brooding over a lost opportunity once the opportunity truly is past. But what if someone had that attitude before the opportunity was past? How would it affect people’s behavior if they thought, “There will always be another opportunity”? The answer, of course, is that they wouldn’t try as hard. If there’s always another opportunity, then there’s nothing to lose by letting this opportunity slip. That’s the thought that stuck in Jeff’s head after that bitter defeat in the state finals, because he’s seen that attitude in business many times— people failing to seize an opportunity because they think, “There’s always a next time.” What this experience taught Jeff was that there isn’t always a next time.

Today, as executive vice president of Sun Products, Jeff tells that story when he comes across someone who isn’t engaged as much as he or she needs to be. Every lost sale, for example, is a lost sale. You might win the business back next year, but you can’t ever get back the lost sale from this year. Jeff’s story helps us appreciate the opportunity we have today as a gift and motivates us to perform like it’s the last game of the state finals, with no “next year” to fall back on.

21st Century Wisdom From An Old African Folktale

image

Once there was a wise, elderly man. . .

. . . who spent his days just outside his village sitting under a shady tree where he would think. One day, a traveler came up to him and said, “Old man, I have traveled far. I have seen many things and met many people. Can you tell me, if I go into this village, what kind of people will I meet there?”

The wise man replied, “Yes, I’d be happy to tell you. But first, tell me what kind of people you’ve met in your travels so far.”

The traveler responded, “Oh, you wouldn’t believe it. I have met the most awful people! People who are selfish and unkind to strangers. People who don’t care for themselves or one another. I’ve met foolish young people I could learn nothing from, and old people whose lack of hope depresses everyone they meet.”

As the traveler spoke, a look of sadness grew in the wise man’s eyes as he nodded in a knowing way. “Yes,” he said. “I believe I know exactly the kind of people you speak of. And I’m sorry to tell you, but if you go into my village, I’m afraid that’s exactly the kind of people you’ll meet.”

“I knew it!” the traveler scoffed. “It’s always the same.” He kicked the dirt under his feet and stormed off down the road, without ever bothering to stop in the village.

A few hours later, another traveler came upon the wise man.

“Kind sir,” he said, “I have traveled far. I have seen many things and met many people. Can you tell me, if I go into this village, what kind of people will I meet there?”

The wise man replied, “Yes, I’d be happy to tell you. But first, tell me what kind of people you’ve met in your travels so far.”

The traveler responded, “Oh, you wouldn’t believe it. I have met the most amazing people! People who are kind and generous to strangers; people who care for one another like family. I’ve met young people with a wisdom beyond their years, and I’ve met older people with a youthful passion for life that brings joy to everyone they meet. And I have learned much from all of them.”

This time, as the traveler spoke, the wise man smiled brightly as he nodded in a knowing way. “Yes,” he said. “I believe I know exactly the kind of people you speak of. And I’m happy to tell you, if you go into my village, I’m certain that’s exactly the kind of people you’ll meet.”

“Come then,” said the traveler, “and introduce me to them.”

The lesson

The lesson, of course, is that what we see in people is determined, in large part, by what we expect to find. So when you go to wherever it is you work tomorrow, and you’re meeting with your team, your peers, your customers, even your boss, look for in them the traits you’d most like to see, and I believe that’s exactly what you’ll find there.

Why This Shark Says You Don’t Have to Be One to Succeed

image

I loved this artice since it has such deep underlying principle and techniques about selling which is no different than what we use in collections. The mention of wants and needs to sell, is your basis of taking F&C to come out strong during  negotations.More importantly it builds a relationship
and connection with the customers that helps both the parties to come to a resolution. There is also a “call to take action” statement that is mentioned, lets see if you are able to identify it. Once you take F&C throw that statement and you will more often than not hit success – Sandy

Selling is not only about making a sale to a customer or a client. At heart, it’s also about persuading someone to see your side of things and reach an outcome that ideally benefits both of you. Some people misunderstand this concept. They think it’s all about coercion and manipulation, when it really involves getting people first to see your side of things, then take the appropriate action. True, the same techniques can be used to sell you a car or a purse or some other item you may or may not need. But it can also help convince your child to eat more vegetables instead of candy. Like every other ability we may have, it’s not the skill itself that is open to criticism— it’s where, when, and how it’s applied.

The magic about knowing how to sell effectively is that anyone will respond to a good sales pitch. Even Sharks. Each of us on Shark Tank has, at one time or another, used a sales technique on a member of the panel. And it often works when we want to take a deal away from someone else. But not always.

When Mark Cuban came on the show he couldn’t help promoting himself as the owner of the NBA Dallas Mavericks. Through his first season on Shark Tank, Mark used professional basketball “shot clock” timing when he tried to pressure us to decide if we were in or out of a deal. This gave us twenty-four seconds to either go along with Mark’s offer or reject it, which gave him an edge. It worked at first, but eventually the rest of us decided this wasn’t a pro basketball game but a cool business decision, and by his second season on the show he dropped the idea.

Lori Greiner has used her own version. She once tried applying pressure to us by taking her checkbook in one hand and her pen in the other before saying to the pitcher—our term for the entrepreneurs who appear on the show seeking an investment—“I’ll sign this check right now and give it to you,” meaning the full amount the pitcher had requested. The effect was to take the deal out of our hands. This was powerful the first time she used it. The next time, we were less impressed.

Demonstrating our selling skills on Shark Tank is fun, but a TV studio is nothing like the real world, where you run up against complex issues such as building a relationship from scratch and identifying the wants and needs of prospective buyers.

I’m sure you understand relationships well, but you may need a clearer understanding of want versus need. If the two words sound as though they mean almost the same thing, they don’t. They are dramatically different in a sales situation, and understanding the difference between them and the role they play in a customer’s buying decision are a key to successful selling. “Want” and “need” identify different mindsets, and each is satisfied in a different way.

Think of them like this:

Someone goes shopping for a new car. If it’s to satisfy a need, he or she will study advertisements, read reviews of different makes and models, talk to friends about the vehicles they drive, set a figure for the maximum amount of money they wish to pay, and visit dealers (or scan the Internet) looking for the best deal on the car that most closely fits their need.

image

But if the car buyer’s need is dominated by a want . . . and the want includes driving a Porsche or a Ferrari . . . the need becomes secondary. It would be wrong and foolish for the sales-person in a Porsche or Ferrari dealership to suggest that the customer should settle for a Ford or a Honda. They are there to satisfy wants, not needs.

Another example: If you need a new watch to tell the time accurately, you can choose a Timex or a hundred other brands. Less than $100 will put one on your wrist and you may never be late for a meeting again. But if what you want is a $10,000 Rolex, your need no longer matters.

Those examples are easy to understand, but much of selling involves needs and wants that are not nearly as clear-cut, and the product being sold is not nearly as pricey and complicated. You can probably recall situations where you went shopping for an item without knowing just what you needed or wanted. “I’ll know it when I see it,” you may have told yourself. But depending on the size and complexity of the purchase, you were unlikely to “see” it without the assistance of skilled salespeople. Their job is to identify and ensure that buyers understand both their needs and their wants, and assist in making the best choice for that situation. If in your “know it when I see it” shopping trip you returned with something that fit both your needs and your wants perfectly, you likely encountered a first-rate salesperson.

Before a salesperson can address a customer’s wants and needs, a connection between the seller and potential buyer must be established. In fact, it’s much more than a linkage; even when measured in moments, the connection can be defined as a relationship of sorts. It hardly extends into a BFF kind of bond, but it needs to be revealing enough to provide the salesperson with an insight into some corners of the buyer’s life.

If this sounds intrusive or manipulative by the salesperson, it’s not. It is, however, essential to the success of every qualified sale that is made.

Here’s how it works:

At the close of the movie The Wolf of Wall Street, the lead character, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, is conducting a sales training course. He hands a pen to one of the young men hanging on his every word and says, “Sell me this pen.” When the man stumbles, unsure how to respond, DiCaprio’s character yanks the pen away and hands it to another man, repeating his order: “Sell me this pen.”

The scene has become something of a party game. A pen or a drinking glass is thrust at a stranger who is ordered to “Sell me this pen/drinking glass/what ever.” Most people respond by talking about the item they’ve been handed. “It’s a very nice pen,” they may say, “with a clip for your pocket and it writes with permanent blue ink and . . .” Or: “This glass is designed to be easily held and sits very sturdily on a flat surface without falling over.”

The correct answer is not to talk about the pen or the drinking glass or the gizmo. It’s to talk about the buyer, and what he or she expects from the product.

Before buyers need to know anything about the pen, the salesperson needs to know something about the buyer. So the response to “Sell me this pen” must be questions such as:

How often do you use a pen?

Do you use it to sign legal documents and on other formal occasions, or just to jot down notes to yourself?

How long have you been shopping for a pen?

All of these, you’ll notice, relate directly to the buyer, not the seller of the pen. That’s why none of the questions refers to the price that the buyer plans to spend, because that’s a question more closely linked to the seller (How much commission can I make on this sale? How hard should I work at it based on how much the sale is worth to me?).

The buyer’s answers may trigger new questions until the seller is prepared to say, Based on what you’ve told me, I have a pen here that fits all of your needs, with a few special features you’ll appreciate.

The salesperson has done two things in this exchange. First, instead of jumping into a sales pitch, she has launched a qualifying session to match the buyer with the product. And second, as limited as it may appear at first glimpse, she has created a relationship with the customer, who recognizes that the salesperson knows enough to make a realistic suggestion about the product.

If this all sounds a little silly, that’s because we’re dealing with pens and drinking glasses, small and incidental things. But the basis still holds all across the spectrum of things being bought and sold. Change the pen to a house, for example, and the qualifying questions are similar—only the dollar value has changed. If I were to order you to sell me a house, questions would pop up in your mind immediately, including:

Where do you want to live— downtown, country, suburbs?

Do you have a family? How many children? Pets, in-laws, parents?

How many bedrooms would you need? How many bathrooms?

Saying to prospective homebuyers, “Th is is a very nice house . . .” before having even the most basic understanding of their needs and expectations—and we haven’t even mentioned budget yet—would be foolish.

Grasping the importance of creating a buyer-seller relationship as the first stage in successful selling is perhaps the most important key to understanding how the entire process works. It’s essential to appreciate this stage of selling, because it dictates everything else that follows. It also illustrates how skilled salespeople can make a positive impact on their lives that has nothing to do with generating a healthy income.

Much of the secret to happiness in our lives is based not on our wealth or our status but on how well we read and deal with those around us— family, friends, colleagues, clients, bosses, and so on. When you’re talking about making a success of a career, many people will say it depends entirely on that skill, and I happen to agree. I can think of many brilliant people, from engineers and medical personnel to musicians and mechanics, whose abilities were never fully realized because they had no idea of how to deal with others.

Most people understand the importance of this knack and try to acquire it. One of the best selling books of all time was Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People. Carnegie published it in 1936, and it was still in print eighty years later after selling more than twenty million copies.

What made it such a success? It was the first book to teach readers how to get along with other people. Some of its chapters were titled:

“Fundamental Techniques for Handling People”
“Twelve Ways to Win People to Your Way of Thinking”
“How to Change People Without Giving Offense or Arousing Resentment”
“Six Ways to Make People Like You”
Soon after its publication, someone described Carnegie’s book by saying that the core idea “is that it is possible to change other people’s behavior by changing one’s behavior toward them.”

And I thought: Wait a minute—that’s the basis of successful selling. Which, in turn, is the secret of getting through life with more successes than failures, more joy than gloom, more friends than enemies.

Does this mean good salespeople enjoy a happier, stress-free life than people in other professions? I happen to believe it’s true. At least they know how to do it more than other people. Whether they apply it to their personal lives effectively is up to them. But here is what all effective salespeople know in their job that they can use in their lives without knowing Dale Carnegie from Carnegie Hall:

They know how to negotiate. It’s a skill needed and acquired when dealing with customers, suppliers, and employees. Negotiating involves listening carefully, evaluating variables, overcoming obstacles, and reaching agreement, and doing it if possible without strife, personal attacks, and burned bridges. You may think it’s all related to settling contracts and making sales. But it’s also part of getting your youngsters to eat their vegetables and working out with your spouse whose job it is to clean the cat’s litter box.
They learn determination. The best salespeople still hear the word no frequently. Instead of seeing it as a rejection, they consider it a challenge. So much of life depends on us not giving up on our goals, and many of us never learn how to do it.

They gain confidence. Nothing delivers self-confidence better than overcoming obstructions to score a victory. It’s not just key to making sales; it’s also an asset in handling crisis situations, small or large.

They get other people to agree with them. In sales, it’s part art, part science. It’s also vital in so many aspects of business and personal life, from getting a raise from your employer to changing your teenager’s conduct.

They practice self- discipline. Most employees in large corporations can sleepwalk their way through much of their work day from time to time and still take home their salary. Depending on commissions earned from your sales almost exclusively means that coasting through a workday costs you money, so you are always aware of the connection between performance and payment.

Not all of these qualities were part of Dale Carnegie’s philosophy, but they’re all part of being able to deal with life and avoiding various disappointments.

So, one more time: Does this mean that, on average, successful salespeople are happier and more satisfied with their job than other people?

It sure seems that way to me.